ArticleJournal of neurosurgery. Case lessons2024
Responsive neurostimulation of the frontal lobe for the detection and treatment of seizures in intractable epilepsy due to tuberous sclerosis complex: illustrative case.
Article in Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Utility of repeat stereotactic EEG in pediatric patients with tuberous sclerosis.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundResponsive neurostimulation (RNS) is often considered to be a palliative therapy for drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) and is generally not considered to be a treatment for patients with tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC). Here, the authors present the case of a 24-year-old male with TSC who obtained seizure freedom following RNS device implantation. OBSERVATIONS: Prior to RNS device implantation, the patient underwent tuberectomies, subependymal giant cell astrocytoma resection, vagus nerve stimulator placement, and left frontal lobe resection but continued to have frequent seizures. An RNS device was implanted, which initially led to a decrease in seizures, but he continued to have 12 seizures per month. He then underwent lead revision for stimulation via a different electrode. After that lead change, he had no seizures for almost 3 years. In the following 3 years, he had two episodes of breakthrough seizures, both of which occurred with medication weans. Although the patient still requires antiseizure medication, he has had years of seizure freedom with RNS therapy. LESSONS: This study exhibits the potential effectiveness of RNS therapy for patients with TSC and DRE. RNS should be considered for patients with TSC when other therapies have not sufficiently treated their epilepsy. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE23411.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.