ArticleJournal of chemical information and modeling2024
Comparative Assessment of Water Models in Protein-Glycan Interaction: Insights from Alchemical Free Energy Calculations and Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
Article in Journal of chemical information and modeling, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interaction mechanism between tetramethylpyrazine and pumpkin seed protein: binding characteristics and functional property changes.Food chemistry: X · 2026Article
- Catalytic Efficiency for the Chemoenzymatic Synthesis of Core Human Milk Oligosaccharides and Analogs via Sugar Oxazolines.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2026Article
- Molecular Modeling of the Pathogenetic Mechanisms of Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Decoding GuaB: Machine Learning-Powered Discovery of Enzyme Inhibitors Against the SuperbugPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison among Amber-ff14SB, Amber-ff19SB, and CHARMM36 Force Fields for Ionic and Electroosmotic Flows in Biological Nanopores.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2025Article
- Decoding SP-D and glycan binding mechanisms using a novel computational workflow.Biophysical journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate computational simulations of protein-glycan dynamics are crucial for a comprehensive understanding of critical biological mechanisms, including host-pathogen interactions, immune system defenses, and intercellular communication. The accuracy of these simulations, including molecular dynamics (MD) simulation and alchemical free energy calculations, critically relies on the appropriate parameters, including the water model, because of the extensive hydrogen bonding with glycan hydroxyl groups. However, a systematic evaluation of water models' accuracy in simulating protein-glycan interaction at the molecular level is still lacking. In this study, we used full atomistic MD simulations and alchemical absolute binding free energy (ABFE) calculations to investigate the performance of five distinct water models in six protein-glycan complex systems. We evaluated water models' impact on structural dynamics and binding affinity through over 5.8 μs of simulation time per system. Our results reveal that most protein-glycan complexes are stable in the overall structural dynamics regardless of the water model used, while some show obvious fluctuations with specific water models. More importantly, we discover that the stability of the binding motif's conformation is dependent on the water model chosen when its residues form weak hydrogen bonds with the glycan. The water model also influences the conformational stability of the glycan in its bound state according to density functional theory (DFT) calculations. Using alchemical ABFE calculations, we find that the OPC water model exhibits exceptional consistency with experimental binding affinity data, whereas commonly used models such as TIP3P are less accurate. The findings demonstrate how different water models affect protein-glycan interactions and the accuracy of binding affinity calculations, which is crucial in developing therapeutic strategies targeting these interactions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.