Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39378289›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2024

Loss of Control Eating in Adults With Impulsive and/or Inattentive Tendencies.

Laura Christie, James H Smith-Spark, Rachel D Teodorini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Laura ChristieDivision of Psychology, London South Bank University, London, UK.
James H Smith-SparkDivision of Psychology, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8216-0547
Rachel D TeodoriniDivision of Psychology, London South Bank University, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9983-7008

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious research has tended to consider impulsive, inattentive, and loss of control eating (LOC) tendencies as symptoms of greater pathologies in treatment-seeking samples. However, inattentive and impulsive tendencies and LOC often co-occur. Although LOC is an important diagnostic component of disordered eating (ED), it has recently been argued to be a dysregulated eating behavior in its own right. The purpose of the current self-report study was, therefore, to investigate the association between impulsive and inattentive tendencies and LOC in adults after accounting for ED.

methodA community sample of 516 adults was surveyed online about their inattentive and impulsive tendencies, LOC, and ED behaviors.

resultsA hierarchical multiple linear regression revealed ED, inattentive, and impulsive symptoms to be independent, significant, positive predictors of LOC. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that the levels of inattentive and, to a lesser extent, impulsive tendencies are significantly associated with LOC in adults, even after ED is accounted for. Moreover, inattentive tendencies were found to be more significantly associated with LOC than impulsive tendencies. These are novel and important findings that can be used to inform both clinicians and individuals with inattentive and impulsive tendencies alike of this association. Considering the well-documented adverse health and wellbeing outcomes associated with LOC, future feasibility trials are needed aimed at treating this co-occurrence.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersImpulsive BehaviorAdolescentAdultAttentionFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf ReportYoung Adultadult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD)disordered eatingimpulsiveinattentiveloss of control eating

Identifiers

PMID39378289
PMCPMC11460641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.