ReviewBrain and behavior2024
Quantitative Electroencephalography Monitoring in Type A Aortic Dissection Surgery: A Clinical Case Review and Prospective Applications.
Review in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of left subclavian artery management on surgical efficiency and perioperative cerebral infarction in type A aortic dissection under deep hypothermic circulatory arrest: a single-center retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive value of multimodal neurological monitoring in the postoperative neurological dysfunction after cardiovascular surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThis review explores advanced methods for assessing perioperative cerebral function in Type A aortic dissection (TAAD) patients, with a focus on quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG). It highlights the critical issue of cerebral malperfusion, which is associated with higher mortality and poor prognosis during the perioperative phase in TAAD patients.
methodThe review centers on the utilization of QEEG as a pivotal tool for the extensive monitoring of brain function at various stages: preoperatively, intraoperatively, and postoperatively. It elaborates on the foundational principles of QEEG, including the mathematical and computational analysis of electroencephalographic signals, enriched with intuitive graphical representations of cerebral functional states. FINDING: QEEG is presented as an innovative approach for the real-time, noninvasive, and reliable assessment of cerebral function. The review details the application of QEEG in monitoring conditions such as preoperative cerebral malperfusion, intraoperative deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, and postoperative recovery of cerebral function in patients undergoing TAAD treatment.
conclusionAlthough QEEG is still in an exploratory phase for TAAD patients, it has shown efficacy in other domains, suggesting its potential in multimodal brain function monitoring. However, its broader application requires further research and technological advancements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.