Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39378280›Full record

ArticleBrain and behavior2024

High Somatization Rates, Frequent Spontaneous Recovery, and a Lack of Organic Biomarkers in Post-Covid-19 Condition.

Anna Tröscher, Patrick Gebetsroither, Marc Rindler, Vincent Böhm, Rainer Dormann, Tim von Oertzen, Anna Heidbreder, Raimund Helbok, Judith Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain and behavior, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anna TröscherDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3003-4677
Patrick GebetsroitherDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Marc RindlerDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Vincent BöhmDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Rainer DormannDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Tim von OertzenDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2164-7842
Anna HeidbrederDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Raimund HelbokDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.
Judith WagnerDepartment of Neurology, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Kepler University Hospital, Linz, Austria.

Funding

Service Center for Clinical Research of the Kepler University Hospital
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMany patients report neuropsychiatric symptoms after SARS-CoV-2 infection. Data on prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition (PCC) vary due to the lack of specific diagnostic criteria, the report of unspecific symptoms, and reliable biomarkers.

methodsPCC patients seen in a neurological outpatient department were followed for up to 18 months. Neurological examination, SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, Epstein-Barr virus antibodies, and cortisol levels as possible biomarkers, questionnaires to evaluate neuropsychiatric symptoms and somatization (Patient Health Questionnaires D [PHQ-D]), cognition deficits (Montreal Cognitive Assessment [MoCA]), sleep disorders (ISS, Epworth Sleepiness Scale [ESS]), and fatigue (FSS) were included.

resultsA total of 175 consecutive patients (78% females, median age 42 years) were seen between May 2021 and February 2023. Fatigue, subjective stress intolerance, and subjective cognitive deficits were the most common symptoms. Specific scores were positive for fatigue, insomnia, and sleepiness and were present in 95%, 62.1%, and 44.0%, respectively. Cognitive deficits were found in 2.3%. Signs of somatization were identified in 61%, who also had an average of two symptoms more than patients without somatization. Overall, 28% had a psychiatric disorder, including depression and anxiety. At the second visit (n = 92), fatigue (67.3%) and insomnia (45.5%) had decreased. At visit three (n = 43), symptom load had decreased in 76.8%; overall, 51.2% of patients were symptom-free. Biomarker testing did not confirm an anti-EBV response. SARS-CoV-2-specific immune reactions increased over time, and cortisol levels were within the physiological range.

conclusionDespite high initial symptom load, 76.8% improved over time. The prevalence of somatization and psychiatric disorders was high. Our data do not confirm the role of previously suggested biomarkers in PCC patients.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCOVID-19Somatoform DisordersAdultCognitive DysfunctionFatigueFemaleHumansHydrocortisoneMaleMiddle AgedPost-Acute COVID-19 SyndromeSARS-CoV-2Sleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersSleep Wake DisordersBiomarkersHydrocortisonebrain fogEBV reactivationpost‐acute sequelae of COVID‐19 (PASC)post‐Covid

Identifiers

PMID39378280
PMCPMC11460636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.