ArticlePloS one2024
Financial resources, access to care, and quality of care mediate racial disparities in statin usage for secondary prevention.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in statin therapy eligibility under the 2026 versus 2018 dyslipidemia guidelines.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Review
- Assessing Prescribing Patterns of Nonstatins as Add-on Therapy for Secondary Prevention in a Federally Qualified Health Center.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are disparities in statin therapy for the secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The role of structural racism in this disparity has not been examined.
methodsThis is a cross-sectional study of participants with ASCVD in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey from 2014-2017. Mediation analysis is utilized to estimate the direct effect of race and indirect effect of financial resources, access to care, and quality of care on statin usage.
resultsThe proportion of participants using statins by race/ethnicity were 58.5% for non-Hispanic Whites, 45% for Hispanics, 48.6% for Blacks, 61.6% for Asians, and 46.8% for Others. Statin usage was lower for Hispanics (OR = 0.79, 95% confidence interval [0.65-0.96]) and Blacks (OR = 0.80 [0.66-0.95]) compared to Whites. Hispanic, Black, and Other participants with the same financial resources, access to care, and quality of care as White participants did not have significantly different statin usage compared to White participants (Hispanic: OR = 0.98 [0.79-1.13]; Black (OR = 0.88 [0.76-1.06], Other: OR 0.76, 95% CI [0.56-1.15]). Hispanic, Black, and Other participants had significantly lower statin usage than subjects of the same race but with financial resources, access to care, and quality of care observed in White subjects (Hispanic: OR = 0.83 [0.83-0.92]; Black: OR = 0.91[0.88-0.94]; Other: OR = 0.92 [0.87-0.98]). DISCUSSION: The indirect effect of race and ethnicity on statin therapy are significant but the direct effect of race and ethnicity on statin therapy are insignificant among Blacks and Hispanics compared to non-Hispanic Whites. This suggests that racial disparities in statin therapy are mediated through inequitably distributed resources, suggestive of the impact of structural racism.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.