ArticlePloS one2024
A computational and machine learning approach to identify GPR40-targeting agonists for neurodegenerative disease treatment.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Approaches for Optimizing Drug Combinations in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Brief Review.ACS omega · 2025Review
- Using computer modeling to find new LRRK2 inhibitors for parkinson's disease.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The G protein-coupled receptor 40 (GPR40) is known to exert a significant influence on neurogenesis and neurodevelopment within the central nervous system of both humans and rodents. Research findings indicate that the activation of GPR40 by an agonist has been observed to promote the proliferation and viability of hypothalamus cells in the human body. The objective of the present study is to discover new agonist compounds for the GPR40 protein through the utilization of machine learning and pharmacophore-based screening techniques, in conjunction with other computational methodologies such as docking, molecular dynamics simulations, free energy calculations, and investigations of the free energy landscape. In the course of our investigation, we successfully identified five unreported agonist compounds that exhibit robust docking score, displayed stability in ligand RMSD and consistent hydrogen bonding with the receptor in the MD trajectories. Free energy calculations were observed to be higher than control molecule. The measured binding affinities of compounds namely 1, 3, 4, 6 and 10 were -13.9, -13.5, -13.4, -12.9, and -12.1 Kcal/mol, respectively. The identified molecular agonist that has been found can be assessed in terms of its therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of neurological diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.