ArticleEJNMMI physics2024
SPECT-MPI iterative denoising during the reconstruction process using a two-phase learned convolutional neural network.
Article in EJNMMI physics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intersoftware variability in SPECT quality control: A technical note on analytical discrepancies and compliance decisions.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- AI in SPECT Imaging: Opportunities and Challenges.Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe problem of image denoising in single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) is a fundamental challenge. Although various image processing techniques have been presented, they may degrade the contrast of denoised images. The proposed idea in this study is to use a deep neural network as the denoising procedure during the iterative reconstruction process rather than the post-reconstruction phase. This method could decrease the background coefficient of variation (COV_bkg) of the final reconstructed image, which represents the amount of random noise, while improving the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR).
methodsIn this study, a generative adversarial network is used, where its generator is trained by a two-phase approach. In the first phase, the network is trained by a confined image region around the heart in transverse view. The second phase improves the network's generalization by tuning the network weights with the full image size as the input. The network was trained and tested by a dataset of 247 patients who underwent two immediate serially high- and low-noise SPECT-MPI.
resultsQuantitative results show that compared to post-reconstruction low pass filtering and post-reconstruction deep denoising methods, our proposed method can decline the COV_bkg of the images by up to 10.28% and 12.52% and enhance the CNR by up to 54.54% and 45.82%, respectively.
conclusionThe iterative deep denoising method outperforms 2D low-pass Gaussian filtering with an 8.4-mm FWHM and post-reconstruction deep denoising approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.