ArticleCancer causes & control : CCC2025
Physical activity before and after cancer diagnosis and mortality risk in three large prospective cohorts.
Article in Cancer causes & control : CCC, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePhysical activity (PA) can improve cancer survival; however, whether the timing of PA differentially affects mortality risk is unclear. We evaluated the association between PA levels pre- and post-diagnosis and mortality risk in the Women's Health Study (WHS), Physicians' Health Study (PHS)-I, and PHS-II prospective cohorts.
methodsWe categorized PA pre- and post-diagnosis as active (WHS: ≥ 7.5 metabolic equivalent (MET)-h/week; PHS: vigorous PA ≥ 2-4 times/week) or inactive. We analyzed changes in pre- and post-diagnosis PA levels as four joint categories: (1) Inactive → Inactive, (2) Active → Inactive, (3) Inactive → Active, and (4) Active → Active, on mortality risk using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression.
resultsWe identified 10,541 participants with incident cancer and 3,696 deaths during follow-up. Compared to maintaining inactivity in both periods, remaining active pre- and post-diagnosis observed lower all-cause (Hazard Ratio [95% confidence interval]: WHS: 0.55 [0.47-0.64]; PHS-I: 0.77 [0.67-0.88]), cancer (WHS: 0.55 [0.45-0.67]; PHS-I: 0.75; [0.61-0.92]) and non-cancer/cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality risks (WHS: 0.49 [0.38-0.65]). Similarly, becoming active post-diagnosis was associated with lower all-cause (WHS: 0.60 (0.48-0.75]; PHS-I: 0.72 [0.61-0.88]), cancer (WHS: 0.65 [0.49-0.86]; PHS-I: 0.64 [0.49-0.84]), and non-cancer/CVD mortality risk (WHS: 0.49 [0.33-0.75]). Being active pre- and post-diagnosis was associated with lower mortality risks in separate analyses, although significance differed by cohort and outcome.
conclusionsRemaining active pre- and post-diagnosis and becoming active post-diagnosis may be associated with improvements in cancer survival, however, research is needed across diverse cancer populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39377971What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.