Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377960›Full record

ReviewPflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology2025

Pioneering new paths: the role of generative modelling in neurological disease research.

Moritz Seiler, Kerstin Ritter

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Moritz SeilerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Kerstin RitterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. kerstin.ritter@med.unituebingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recently, deep generative modelling has become an increasingly powerful tool with seminal work in a myriad of disciplines. This powerful modelling approach is supposed to not only have the potential to solve current problems in the medical field but also to enable personalised precision medicine and revolutionise healthcare through applications such as digital twins of patients. Here, the core concepts of generative modelling and popular modelling approaches are first introduced to consider the potential based on methodological concepts for the generation of synthetic data and the ability to learn a representation of observed data. These potentials will be reviewed using current applications in neuroimaging for data synthesis and disease decomposition in Alzheimer's disease and multiple sclerosis. Finally, challenges for further research and applications will be discussed, including computational and data requirements, model evaluation, and potential privacy risks.

Indexed as

Nervous System DiseasesAlzheimer DiseaseAnimalsHumansNeuroimagingGenerative modellingNeuroimagingNeurological disordersSynthetic data

Identifiers

PMID39377960
PMCPMC11958445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.