Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377940›Full record

ReviewPediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2025

An updated approach to the evaluation of the urinary sediment.

Giovanni B Fogazzi, Giuseppe Garigali, Matteo Abinti, Giulia Lieti, Simona Verdesca

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Global access to management of primary hyperoxaluria: a survey on behalf of OxalEurope, G&K Working Group of the ERA and ESPN.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Giovanni B FogazziClinical and Research Laboratory On Urinary Sediment, SC Di Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto Di Rene, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy. giovanni.fogazzi@policlinico.mi.it.
Giuseppe GarigaliClinical and Research Laboratory On Urinary Sediment, SC Di Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto Di Rene, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Matteo AbintiSC Di Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto Di Rene, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
Giulia LietiUSC Di Nefrologia E Dialisi, Ospedale Di Garbagnate Milanese, Garbagnate Milanese, Italy.
Simona VerdescaSC Di Nefrologia, Dialisi e Trapianto Di Rene, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Examination of the urinary sediment (U-sed) is an important non-invasive, rapid, and inexpensive tool for the diagnosis and surveillance over time of renal diseases. In this Educational Review, we describe first how to collect, prepare, and examine urine samples in order to obtain reliable results. Then, we describe the U-sed findings in isolated microscopic hematuria, glomerular diseases, acute interstitial nephritis, acute kidney injury, reactivation of the BK virus in kidney transplant recipients, and crystalluric genetic diseases.

Indexed as

Kidney DiseasesUrinalysisHematuriaHumansPhase contrast microscopyPolarized light microscopyRenal disease diagnosisStandardized approachUrinalysisUrinary sedimentUrine microscopy

Identifiers

PMID39377940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.