Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377928›Full record

ReviewDeutsches Arzteblatt international2024

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

Maximilian N Möbius-Winkler, Ulrich Laufs, Karsten Lenk

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Deutsches Arzteblatt international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. [Update on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maximilian N Möbius-WinklerClinic and Polyclinic for Cardiology, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig.
Ulrich Laufs
Karsten Lenk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with or without left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction is a common primary myocardial disease, with a prevalence of 1:500. It is characterized by thickening of the myocardium. Its diagnostic evaluation includes history-taking and physical examination, genetic studies, transthoracic echocardiography, and cardiac MRI. When optimally treated, it carries a mortality of less than 1% per year.

methodsThis review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search, including the current guidelines.

resultsIn symptomatic patients with high LVOT gradients (≥ 50 mm Hg), the treatment of first choice is pharmacotherapy with nonvasodilating beta-blockers or non-dihydropyridine-type calcium channel antagonists. Common side effects include bradycardia and hypotension, and there is a risk of AV nodal blockade. Both substance classes lower the LVOT gradient. Beta-blockers alleviate dyspnea and improve patients' quality of life. Verapamil can increase physical resilience. A further option is mavacamten, a myosin inhibitor that gained approval in Germany in mid-2023: it, too, lowers the LVOT gradient and improves quality of life. In 7-10% of patients, there is a reversible reduction of the left ventricular ejection fraction to less than 50%. Septal reduction treatments can be considered if drug therapy fails. Attention must also be paid to the management of sequelae such as atrial fibrillation, malignant arrhythmias, and mitral valve insufficiency.

conclusionPatients with HCM have a near-normal life expectancy if the disease is diagnosed early and treated according to the guidelines. The treatment of HCM and HOCM (hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy) have been studied in no more than a few clinical trials, and randomized studies with clinical endpoints are needed.

Indexed as

Adrenergic beta-AntagonistsCardiomyopathy, HypertrophicCalcium Channel BlockersEchocardiographyHumansVentricular Outflow ObstructionAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCalcium Channel Blockers

Identifiers

PMID39377928
PMCPMC12442803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.