ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2026
Real-world experience in initiation of treatment with the selective cardiomyosin inhibitor mavacamten in an outpatient clinic cohort during the 12-week titration period.
Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mavacamten in the Treatment of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: from Pathophysiology To Real World Data.Current cardiology reports · 2025Review
- Early Detection of Treatment Response to Mavacamten in Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy With Severe Mitral Regurgitation Using Magnetocardiography.Clinical case reports · 2025Article
- Real-World Experience of Mavacamten for Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in South Korea: A Prospective Multi-Center Observational Study.Korean circulation journal · 2025Article
- Hemodynamic and symptomatic response in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy patients on myosin inhibitor therapy.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionLately, mavacamten emerged as a new therapeutic option for symptomatic patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (oHCM). Clinical trials revealed reduction of serum biomarkers, and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction, as well as an improvement in clinical symptoms and exercise capacity. Nevertheless, clinical experience and manageability of patients in a real-world setting is still lacking. MATERIAL AND
methods22 patients with symptomatic oHCM (54.5% male, age 58.5 ± 16.2 years) and elevated LVOT gradients were started on mavacamten between March 2023 and June 2024. All patients were New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II or higher. Seven patients were excluded from primary analysis due to comedication with Angiotensin-converting-enzyme-inhibitors or Angiotensin-II receptor blockers. Cardiac imaging, laboratory work-up and clinical evaluation were assessed at three visits during the 12 weeks initiation phase; Dosing of mavacamten was adjusted according to manufacturer's recommendations.
resultsAt 12 weeks, the majority of patients described a significant improvement of their quality of life. Work-up at 12 weeks revealed a significant reduction of serum biomarkers and LVOT gradients. In four patients, mavacamten needed to be temporarily paused due to clinical complaints or transient left ventricular ejection fraction deterioration below 50% with subsequent full recovery.
conclusionWe provide first insights into the usage of mavacamten in oHCM patients during the titration period in a real-world setting. Clinical findings are in line with previous clinical trials. In accordance with current recommendations, we highlight the need for standardized follow-up of patients on mavacamten treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.