Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377878›Full record

ArticleOphthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists)2025

Deprivation and NHS General Ophthalmic Service sight testing activity in England in 2022-2023.

Robert A Harper, Jeremy Hooper, David J Parkins, Cecilia H Fenerty, James Roach, Michael Bowen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Evaluation of the Community Urgent Eyecare Service in Greater Manchester, Including the Impact of Independent Prescribing.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Loneliness and Mental Wellbeing in People With Inherited Macular Disease.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Analysing Patterns in Electronic Optometry Referrals: Feasibility and Methodology.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deprivation and NHS General Ophthalmic Service sight testing activity in England in 2022-2023.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert A HarperManchester Royal Eye Hospital and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5437-2553
Jeremy HooperConclusio, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, UK.
David J ParkinsInstitute of Optometry, London, UK.
Cecilia H FenertyManchester Royal Eye Hospital and Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust Manchester, Manchester, UK.
James RoachConclusio, Cardiff Gate Business Park, Cardiff, UK.
Michael BowenCollege of Optometrists, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4818-9450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSocioeconomic deprivation is associated with an increased incidence of sight-loss. To inform potential developments in eyecare, General Ophthalmic Service (GOS) sight-testing activity was explored in relation to deprivation for GOS contractors submitting National Health Service (NHS) claims in England.

methodsData on NHS sight-test claims for the financial year 2022-2023 were sought from NHS England (NHSE), including number of sight-tests by GOS contractors, their unique Organisation Data Service codes and postcodes and age-bands of patients accessing sight-testing. Deprivation scores were assigned to contractor practices using the Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD) and the average number of sight-tests for all contractors within each IMD decile calculated, allowing rate of sight-testing per 1000 population per decile of deprivation to be estimated using Office of National Statistics (ONS) Lower Layer Super Output Area mid-year population estimates. Inequality was examined using the Odds Ratio (OR) and slope and relative index of inequality measures (SSI and RII).

resultsOverall, 12.94 million NHS sight-tests were provided by 5622 GOS contractors in England in 2022-2023. Most affluent decile GOS contractors undertook an average ~2200 NHS sight-tests, while in the most deprived decile, average NHS sight-tests per contractor was ~1100. Rate of sight-testing per 1000 population in the most deprived decile was one quarter of that in the most affluent, with an OR of 5.29 (95% CI 5.27-5.30), indicating those in the most affluent areas were ~five times more likely to access NHS sight-tests. Overall, SII and RII were 333.5 (95% CI 333.52-333.53) and 6.4 (95% CI 6.39-6.40), respectively, findings reflective of substantial inequality in uptake.

conclusionThere remains substantial unwarranted variation in uptake of NHS sight-testing, with those in more affluent areas accessing sight-testing substantially more than those in more deprived areas. Strategies are required to facilitate primary care optometry to provide more equitable access to eyecare.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyState MedicineAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolEnglandFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic Factorsdeprivationprimary care optometrysight‐testing

Identifiers

PMID39377878
PMCPMC11629842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.