ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Integrative analysis of multiple cell death model for precise prognosis and drug response prediction in gastric cancer.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Evolutionary Research Framework for the Tumor Microenvironment in Gastric Cancer.Journal of inflammation research · 2026Article
- A Prognostic Lysine Crotonylation Signature Shapes the Immune Microenvironment in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Current medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Advances in the study of disulfidptosis in digestive tract tumors.Discover oncology · 2025Review
- Multi-omics analysis of parthanatos related molecular subgroup and prognostic model development in stomach adenocarcinoma.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundGastric cancer (GC) is a common upper gastrointestinal tumor. However, the evaluation of prognosis and treatment response in patients with gastric cancer remains a challenge. Programmed cell death (PCD) is one of the important terminal paths for the cells of metazoans, and is involved in a variety of biological events that include morphogenesis, maintenance of tissue homeostasis, and elimination of harmful cells. The objective of this project is to investigate the predictive significance of cell death pathways and create prognostic signatures associated to cell death, with the purpose of forecasting prognosis and providing guidance for the treatment of gastric cancer.
methodsGene transcription profiles and corresponding clinical data of gastric cancer patients were collected from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA-STAD, n = 448) and the Gene Expression Comprehensive Database (GSE84437, n = 483). Thirteen types of cell death-related genes, including apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, ferroptosis, autophagy, cuprotosis, parthanatos, entotic cell death, netotic cell death, lysosome-dependent cell death, alkaliptosis, oxeiptosis, and disulfidptosis, were analysed. Cell death-related genes associated with prognosis were identified in the TCGA-STAD training cohort using Lasso-Cox regression to generate a risk score. Patients were categorized into high and low-risk groups based on the median risk score for survival difference analysis. Cell death-related genes associated with prognosis were identified in the TCGA-STAD training cohort using Lasso-Cox regression to generate a risk score. Additionally, the response to immunotherapy in the high-risk and low-risk groups was calculated using the oncoPredict algorithm. Futhermore, the model genes were validated in the GEO validation set.
resultsA total of 324 differential programmed cell death (PCD)-related genes were identified, and 65 were selected through single-factor Cox analysis. Six PCD-related genes were ultimately identified by Lasso regression to construct a prognostic risk score model. The log-rank test revealed that patients in the high-risk group had inferior survival time compared with those in the low-risk group. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the training group at years 1, 3, and 5 were 0.684, 0.713, 0.743, respectively, while the AUC for the validation cohort at years 1, 3, and 5 were 0.695, 0.704, and 0.707, respectively. Unsupervised clustering identified potential subtypes included in the model, and a survival difference was also observed between the two subgroups. Multifactor Cox results, combined with clinical information, demonstrated that the prognostic risk score can serve as an independent prognostic factor, irrespective of other clinical features.
conclusionBy comprehensively analyzing multiple cell death patterns, we have established a novel model that accurately forecasts the clinical prognosis and drug sensitivity of gastric cancer. It was found that all 12 representative drugs may not be suitable for patients in high-risk groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.