ArticleNeurosurgical review2024
Comment on - "Access to Meckel's cave for biopsies of indeterminate lesions: a systematic review".
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2025-01-31Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Investigation by Journal/Publisher ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accessing Meckel's cave for biopsies of indeterminate lesions presents significant surgical challenges. This systematic review evaluates various approaches, with a focus on minimally invasive endoscopic techniques. A review of 75 studies reveals that the endoscopic endonasal transpterygoid approach offers improved visualization, reduced morbidity, and favorable outcomes, as demonstrated by an illustrative case of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. While promising, further studies are needed to assess long-term efficacy and patient outcomes, and comparative research between endoscopic and traditional approaches is recommended for future investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39377849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.