ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2025
Reassessment of arterial versus venous perfusion of diabetic retinal neovascularization using ultrawide-field fluorescein angiography.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe purpose of this study was to assess whether diabetic NV is perfused by the arterial or the venous circulation.
methodsThis is a retrospective, consecutive case series evaluating patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) imaged with ultrawide-field (UWF) fluorescein angiography (FA). Areas of neovascularization elsewhere (NVE) and neovascularization of the disc (NVD) were assessed. Perfusion was defined as arterial, arteriovenous, or venous if the area of diabetic neovascularization (NV) began to hyperfluoresce either prior, during, or after laminar venous flow, respectively.
resultsA total of 180 eyes from 176 patients with 928 NV were identified (830 NVE, 98 NVD). Of those, 5.1% of NVE were classified as arterial and 58.2% of NVD were classified as arterial. The remaining NV were classified as arteriovenous except for a small subset (6.1%) which were indeterminate. None of the NV were classified as venous. Noteworthy examples demonstrated NV that nearly fully perfused prior to any detectable fluorescence within nearby veins as well as clear shunting of blood from a feeding artery to a draining vein.
conclusionsUWF FA images suggest that some NV is perfused by retinal arteries. This may be useful in devising strategies for early detection and treatment of NV precursors. KEY MESSAGES: What is known • Diabetic retinal neovascularization has long been thought to be perfused by the retinal venous circulation. • Vascular endothelial growth factor has been shown to play key roles in both angiogenesis and arteriogenesis. What is new • Ultrawide-field fluorescein angiography demonstrates that at least some diabetic neovascularization is perfused by the retinal arterial circulation. • This supports the hypothesis that diabetic neovascularization may arise from arterially-perfused intraretinal microvascular abnormalities in the capillary bed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39377805What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.