ReviewJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology2025
Approach to Newborns with Elevated TSH: A Different Perspective from the International Guidelines for Iodine-deficient Countries
Review in Journal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lowering of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) cutoffs in newborn screening programs has created a management dilemma by leading to more frequent detection of neonates with elevated TSH concentrations due to false-positive results, transient neonatal hyperthyrotropinemia (NHT), and milder forms of congenital hypothyroidism. Current consensus guidelines recommend starting treatment if the venous TSH level is >20 mU/L in the face of a normal free thyroxine (FT4) level, which is an arbitrary threshold for treatment decisions. In countries such as Türkiye, where transient NHT may be more common due to iodine deficiency (ID) and/or overload, putting this recommendation into daily practice may lead to unnecessary or over treatment, time-consuming long-term follow-up, and increased workload and costs. In this review, we addressed alternative approaches for infants with elevated TSH concentrations detected at newborn screening. The suggested management approach can be summarized as: Infants with mild NHT (venous TSH <20 mU/L) should be followed without treatment. In moderate NHT (venous TSH 20-30 mU/L), treatment or monitoring decisions can be made according to age, TSH trend and absolute FT4 level. Moderate cases of NHT should be treated if age at confirmatory testing is >21 days or if there is no downward trend in TSH and FT4 level is in the lower half of age-specific reference range in the first 21 days. In in-between cases of moderate NHT, thyroid ultrasound may guide treatment decision by determining mild cases of thyroid dysgenesis that require life-long treatment. Otherwise, monitoring is a reasonable option. Infants with compensated hypothyroidism (venous TSH >30 mU/L and normal FT4) or persistent hyperthyrotropinemia (>6-10 mU/L after the neonatal period) should receive L-thyroxine treatment. However, all treated cases of isolated TSH elevation should be closely monitored to avoid overtreatment, and re-evaluated by a trial off therapy. This alternative approach will largely eliminate unnecessary treatment of infants with transient NHT, mostly caused by ID or excess in Türkiye, and will reduce workload and costs by preventing unwarranted investigation and long-term follow-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.