SynthesisPain management2024
Efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Pain management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Safety of Toludesvenlafaxine in the Treatment of Non-specific Low Back Pain
Efficacy and Safety of Venlafaxine in the Treatment of Non-specific Low Back Pain
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The prevalence of depression in patients with lumbar degenerative disk disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2025Pooled it
- Advancing chronic low back pain management: Insights from amitriptyline and duloxetine comparison.World journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Comparative effectiveness of amitriptylineWorld journal of methodology · 2026Article
- Comparison of the Efficacy of Different Traditional Chinese Exercises in the Treatment of Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Bayesian Network Meta-Analysis.Journal of pain research · 2026Review
- Exosome-mediated miRNA delivery: a molecular switch for reshaping neuropathic pain therapy.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.