ArticleCurrent drug safety2025
Imipenem-Cilastatin-Induced Seizures: A Case Report.
Article in Current drug safety, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImipenem-cilastatin, a carbapenem antibiotic, is commonly used for severe bacterial infections. While generally well-tolerated, it can rarely cause central nervous system toxicity, including seizures. We have, herein, reported a case of imipenem-cilastatin-induced seizure in a 20-year-old patient. CASE PRESENTATION: A 20-year-old male was admitted to the intensive care unit for febrile status epilepticus and acute respiratory distress syndrome. Initial evaluations ruled out underlying causes and anti-epileptic treatment has been initiated. Despite having an effective anti-epileptic treatment for three months of hospitalization, seizure recurrence occurred, leading to antibiotic regimen adjustment as the imputability of imipenem-cilastatin was suspected. After discontinuation of the involved drug, the patient remained neurologically stable. Previous literature has reported cases of imipenem-cilastatin-induced seizures, particularly in elderly patients or at higher dosages. The causality assessment was conducted using the updated French method, which rated the chronological criterion as C2 and the semiological criterion as S2. The intrinsic imputability score was I3, indicating plausible causality, and the extrinsic bibliographic score was B3.
conclusionOur case has highlighted the importance of promptly recognizing imipenem-cilastatin- induced epileptic seizures in order to treat them more effectively and thus optimize the patient's care. Therefore, we emphasize that clinicians be vigilant about the side effects of its use, particularly in patients with neurological susceptibilities. We also advocate a personalized choice of antibiotics, taking into account both antimicrobial efficacy and potential adverse effects, for better outcomes with fewer risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39377408What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.