Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377364›Full record

Trial reportJournal of sleep research2025

Pitolisant 40 mg for excessive daytime sleepiness in obstructive sleep apnea patients treated or not by CPAP: Randomised phase 3 study.

Yves Dauvilliers, Sonya Elizabeth Craig, Maria R Bonsignore, Ferran Barbé, Johan Verbraecken, Jerryl Asin, Ognian Georgiev, Rumen Tiholov, Christian Caussé, Jeanne-Marie Lecomte and 5 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of sleep research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Yves DauvilliersCentre National de Référence Narcolepsie, Unité du Sommeil, CHU Montpellier, Hôpital Gui-de-Chauliac, Service de Neurologie, Université de Montpellier, INSERM INM, Montpellier, France.
Sonya Elizabeth CraigLiverpool Sleep and Ventilation Centre, University Hospital Aintree, Liverpool University Foundation Trust, Liverpool, UK.
Maria R BonsignorePROMISE Department, University of Palermo, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation (IRIB), National Research Council (CNR), Palermo, Italy.
Ferran BarbéRespiratory Department, Institut Ricerca Biomedica de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain.
Johan VerbraeckenMultidisciplinary Sleep Disorders Centre, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, Edegem-Antwerp, Belgium.
Jerryl AsinDepartment of Pulmonary Medicine, Centre for Sleep Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, The Netherlands.
Ognian GeorgievDepartment of Internal Medicine, Pulmonology, Alexandrovska Hospital Medical University, Sofia, Bulgaria.
Rumen TiholovDepartment of Internal Diseases, Sv. Ivan Rilski Multiprofile Hospital for Active Treatment, Kozloduy, Bulgaria.
Christian CausséBioprojet Pharma, Paris, France.
Jeanne-Marie LecomteBioprojet Pharma, Paris, France.
Jean-Charles SchwartzBioprojet Pharma, Paris, France.
Philippe LehertFaculty of Economics, University Louvain, Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Winfried RanderathBethanien Hospital, Institute of Pneumonology, University of Cologne, Solingen, Germany.
Jean-Louis PépinHP2 Laboratory INSERM U1300, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.
HAROSA III Study Group

Funding

Bioprojet Pharma
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) syndrome commonly leads to excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Pitolisant, a selective histamine-3 receptor antagonist, is efficacious at doses up to 20 mg once daily in OSA treated or not with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). We assessed the efficacy and safety of pitolisant at doses up to 40 mg once daily in patients with moderate to severe OSA treated or not with CPAP therapy. In this phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, patients with OSA were assigned 2:1 to receive pitolisant (according to an individual up-titration scheme, 10, 20 or 40 mg once daily) or placebo for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was a change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score from baseline to week 12. Secondary endpoints included a change in reaction time using the Oxford Sleep Resistance test (OSleR), Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGI-C), and Patient's Global Opinion of the Effect (PGOE) of study treatment. Overall, 361 patients (mean age 52.4 years, 77.3% male; mean apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] 27.0 events/h) were randomised to receive pitolisant (n = 242; 50% received CPAP) or placebo (n = 119; 48.7% CPAP). After the dose-adjustment phase (week 3), 88.8% of patients received pitolisant 40 mg. Compared with placebo, pitolisant produced a significant reduction in the ESS score at week 12 (least square mean difference -2.6 (95% CI: -3.4; -1.8; p < 0.001)) irrespective of CPAP use; and improved the reaction time on OSleR, CGI-C, and PGOE at week 12. Pitolisant was well tolerated; no new safety signals were identified. In conclusion, pitolisant up to 40 mg once daily was an effective treatment for EDS in patients with moderate to severe OSA irrespective of CPAP use.

Indexed as

Continuous Positive Airway PressureDisorders of Excessive SomnolencePiperidinesSleep Apnea, ObstructiveAdultAgedDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTreatment OutcomePiperidinespitolisantcontinuous positive airway pressureexcessive daytime sleepinessobstructive sleep apneapitolisant

Identifiers

PMID39377364
PMCPMC12069729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.