Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377358›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2025

Molecular and clinical heterogeneity within MYC-family amplified medulloblastoma is associated with survival outcomes: A multicenter cohort study.

Edward C Schwalbe, Janet C Lindsey, Marina Danilenko, Rebecca M Hill, Stephen Crosier, Sarra L Ryan, Daniel Williamson, Jemma Castle, Debbie Hicks, Marcel Kool and 5 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Surgical resection in medulloblastoma: a crossroads in the molecular era.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Pediatric medulloblastoma.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Edward C SchwalbeWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Janet C LindseyWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Marina DanilenkoWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Rebecca M HillWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Stephen CrosierWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Sarra L RyanWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Daniel WilliamsonWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Jemma CastleWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Debbie HicksWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Marcel KoolHopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Till MildeHopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7267-1052
Andrey KorshunovHopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Stefan M PfisterHopp Children´s Cancer Center (KiTZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon BaileyWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Steven C CliffordWolfson Childhood Cancer Research Centre, Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4893-2184

Funding

Cancer Research UK DRCRPG-NOV22/100002Children with Cancer UKThe Brain Tumour Charity
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMYC/MYCN are the most frequent oncogene amplifications in medulloblastoma (MB) and its primary biomarkers of high-risk (HR) disease. However, while many patients' MYC(N)-amplified tumors are treatment-refractory, some achieve long-term survival. We therefore investigated clinicobiological heterogeneity within MYC(N)-amplified MB and determined its relevance for improved disease management.

methodsWe characterized the clinical and molecular correlates of MYC- (MYC-MB; n = 64) and MYCN-amplified MBs (MYCN-MB; n = 95), drawn from >1600 diagnostic cases.

resultsMost MYC-MBs were molecular group 3 (46/58; 79% assessable) and aged ≥3 years at diagnosis (44/64 [69%]). We identified a "canonical" very high-risk (VHR) MYC-amplified group (n = 51/62; 82%) with dismal survival irrespective of treatment (11% 5-year progression-free survival [PFS]), defined by co-occurrence with ≥1 additional established risk factor(s) (subtotal surgical-resection [STR], metastatic disease, LCA pathology), and commonly group 3/4 subgroup 2 with a high proportion of amplified cells. The majority of remaining noncanonical MYC-MBs survived (i.e. non-group 3/group 3 without other risk features; 11/62 (18%); 61% 5-year PFS). MYCN survival was primarily related to molecular group; MYCN-amplified SHH MB, and group 3/4 MB with additional risk factors, respectively defined VHR and HR groups (VHR, 39% [35/89]; 20% 5-year PFS/HR, 33% [29/89]; 46% 5-year PFS). Twenty-two out of 35 assessable MYCN-amplified SHH tumors harbored TP53 mutations; 9/12 (75%) with data were germline. MYCN-amplified group 3/4 MB with no other risk factors (28%; 25/89) had 70% 5-year PFS.

conclusionsMYC(N)-amplified MB displays significant clinicobiological heterogeneity. Diagnostics incorporating molecular groups, subgroups, and clinical factors enable their risk assessment. VHR "canonical" MYC tumors are essentially incurable and SHH-MYCN-amplified MBs fare extremely poorly (20% survival at 5 years); both require urgent development of alternative treatment strategies. Conventional risk-adapted therapies are appropriate for more responsive groups, such as noncanonical MYC and non-SHH-MYCN MB.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCerebellar NeoplasmsGene AmplificationMedulloblastomaN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleBiomarkers, TumorMYCN protein, humanMYC protein, humanN-Myc Proto-Oncogene ProteinProto-Oncogene Proteins c-mycmedulloblastomaMYC amplificationMYCN amplificationsurvival

Identifiers

PMID39377358
PMCPMC11726341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.