Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377096›Full record

ArticleGenetics research2024

Pivotal Role of FBXW4 in Glioma Progression and Prognosis.

Kun Chen, Lei Pu, Yuzuo Hui

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kun ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery LiaoCheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong, China.
Lei PuDepartment of Brain Disease Liaocheng Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong, China.
Yuzuo HuiDepartment of Neurosurgery LiaoCheng People's Hospital, Liaocheng 252000, Shandong, China.ORCID 0009-0002-4679-7759

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds: Glioma stands as one of the most formidable brain tumor types, with patient outcomes remaining bleak even in the face of advancements in treatment modalities. FBXW4, a constituent of the F-box and WD repeat domain-containing protein family, is recognized for its participation in diverse cellular activities, including those related to tumor dynamics. Yet, the therapeutic relevance and specific role of FBXW4 in the context of glioma are not well defined. This study aims to elucidate the functional dynamics and significance of FBXW4 in glioma cases. Methods: This research undertook a comprehensive analysis of FBXW4's expression patterns and clinical relevance in glioma by harnessing data from the TCGA and GTEx databases. Results: The investigation revealed a distinct downregulation of FBXW4 in glioma tissues compared to normal brain counterparts, with a pronounced correlation between FBXW4 levels and disease severity. Intriguingly, FBXW4 expression inversely related to WHO tumor grades, with the most advanced grade IV gliomas exhibiting the lowest FBXW4 levels, whereas grade II tumors demonstrated the highest. Cases presenting with IDH1/2 mutations or 1p/19q codeletions were also associated with elevated FBXW4 levels. Furthermore, diminished FBXW4 expression aligned with an increased risk of mortality. Conclusions: The findings suggest that FBXW4 holds promise as a prognostic marker and a potential therapeutic avenue in glioma management. Nonetheless, future research is imperative to decode the intricate signaling pathways involving FBXW4 and to understand its broader clinical ramifications in glioma treatment paradigms.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsF-Box ProteinsGliomaBiomarkers, TumorDisease ProgressionFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMaleMutationPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorF-Box Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39377096
PMCPMC11458277

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.