Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377094›Full record

ArticleERJ open research2024

High-flow humidified oxygen as an early intervention in children with acute severe asthma: a feasibility randomised controlled trial.

Akshat Kapur, Héctor Rojas-Anaya, Graham Roberts, Damian Roland, Atul Gupta, Michaela Lazner, Jane Bayreuther, Fleur Cantle, Christina Jones, John Pappachan and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ERJ open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Akshat KapurUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Héctor Rojas-AnayaUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Graham RobertsUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2252-1248
Damian RolandChildren's Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9334-5144
Atul GuptaKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Michaela LaznerUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Jane BayreutherUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Fleur CantleKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Christina JonesSchool of Psychology, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-6631
John PappachanUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Stephen BremnerBrighton and Sussex Clinical Trials Unit, Brighton, UK.
David JamesUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Shane FitzgeraldChildren's Emergency Department, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Kelly OwensUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.
Lalarukh AsimKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Ekaterina KhalevaUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul SeddonUniversity Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2136-958X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Treating children with acute severe asthma (ASA) who fail to respond to first-line inhaled bronchodilators is problematic: use of intravenous agents is inconsistent and side-effects are common. High-flow humidified oxygen (HiFlo) has shown promise in other respiratory conditions and is increasingly used in ASA, but with little evidence. Methods: We conducted a feasibility randomised controlled trial with deferred consent to assess early HiFlo in children aged 2-11 years with ASA not responding to "burst" therapy (high-dose inhaled salbutamol ± ipratropium). Children with Paediatric Respiratory Assessment Measure (PRAM) score 5+ after "burst" were randomised to commence HiFlo or follow standard care. Candidate primary outcomes assessed were treatment failure requiring escalation, and time to meeting hospital discharge criteria. Results: The target was met despite coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic disruption: 56 children were randomised across four sites, with deferred consent received in 50 out of 56 (89%), and mean recruitment rate 1.1 per site per month. 28 were allocated early HiFlo and 22 standard care. Data collection was complete for both candidate primary outcomes. Treatment failure requiring escalation occurred in 18 of 28 children (64%) in the HiFlo arm and in 19 of 22 (86%) in the standard care arm. Median (interquartile range) time from randomisation to meeting discharge criteria was 29.3 h (21.8-43.7 h) in the HiFlo arm and 36.8 h (24.1-46.3 h) in the standard care arm. Conclusions: HiFlo in childhood ASA is a potentially promising intervention whose use is increasing despite lack of evidence. A definitive randomised controlled trial to assess its effectiveness is required and appears to be feasible.

Identifiers

PMID39377094
PMCPMC11456965

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.