Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39377012›Full record

ArticleAsia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology2024

Fast rehabilitation does not worsen clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic outcomes after medial meniscus posterior root repair: A retrospective comparative study.

Masanori Tamura, Takayuki Furumatsu, Yusuke Yokoyama, Yuki Okazaki, Koki Kawada, Toshifumi Ozaki

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asia-Pacific journal of sports medicine, arthroscopy, rehabilitation and technology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masanori TamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Takayuki FurumatsuDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama Red Cross Hospital, 2-1-1 Aoe, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8607, Japan.
Yusuke YokoyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Yuki OkazakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Koki KawadaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.
Toshifumi OzakiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2-5-1 Shikatacho, Kitaku, Okayama, 700-8558, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Objective: The main surgical treatment for medial meniscus posterior root tear (MMPRT) has shifted from meniscectomy to meniscus repair; however, there is no clear consensus regarding the optimal postoperative management strategy after MMPRT repair. This study aimed to perform a comparative analysis of patients who received conventional rehabilitation or fast rehabilitation following MMPRT repair. Methods: The current retrospective cohort study compared clinical, radiological, and arthroscopic outcomes after conventional rehabilitation (group A, January 2020 to April 2020, 24 patients) with those after fast rehabilitation (group B, May 2020 to August 2020, 24 patients) in patients who underwent pullout repair for MMPRT. Partial weight-bearing and range of motion exercises were allowed 2 weeks postoperatively in group A and 1 week postoperatively in group B. In patients with an average weight of approximately 60 kg, full weight bearing was allowed 4 weeks postoperatively in group A and 3 weeks postoperatively in group B. Results: At 12 months postoperatively, the clinical scores, including International Knee Documentation Committee and Japanese Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.01). Although meniscus healing was achieved in both groups, medial meniscus extrusion significantly progressed by 0.9 mm in group A and 0.8 mm in group B (p < 0.01, compared with preoperative extrusion). There were no significant differences in clinical scores, arthroscopic meniscal healing status, or medial meniscus extrusion progression on magnetic resonance images between the groups. Conclusion: A fast rehabilitation protocol can be safely implemented without compromising patient outcomes after pullout repair for MMPRT.

Indexed as

ArthroscopyMedial meniscusPosterior root tearPullout repairRehabilitation

Identifiers

PMID39377012
PMCPMC11456922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.