ArticleRadiology case reports2024
A case of de novo extra-stent ulceration induced by persistent plaque protrusion after carotid artery stenting with a CASPER stent for a large-volume unstable plaque.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Plaque protrusion (PP) has been identified as a perioperative complication of carotid artery stenosis treated with carotid artery stenting (CAS). The CASPER stent (CS), a dual-layer micromesh stent, may be able to prevent PP. Despite using CS, de novo extra-stent ulceration induced by persistent PP is rare. A 75-year-old male patient, whose superficial temporal artery-middle cerebral artery bypass tended to occlude, underwent CAS using a CS for symptomatic pseudo-occlusive internal carotid artery with a large-volume unstable plaque. This led to de novo extra-stent ulceration induced by persistent PP, resulting in ischemic stroke that necessitated the application of the stent-in-stent technique. There was no recurrence of cerebral infarction postoperatively at 12 months. Here, we present, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of a patient with de novo extra-stent ulceration induced by persistent PP after CAS that led to de novo extra-stent ulceration. The inhibition of intimal formation on the stent surface caused by persistent PP was considered to be the underlying mechanism. The stent-in-stent technique is beneficial even in cases of PP accompanied by de novo extra-stent ulceration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.