ReviewCureus2024
Advances in Tissue Engineering and Its Future in Regenerative Medicine Compared to Traditional Reconstructive Techniques: A Comparative Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- From Nature to Innovation: Exploring Natural Biopolymers in 3D Bioprinting for Bone Regeneration.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Advancements in Skeletal Tumour Management: Linking Metastatic Biology With Surgical Reconstruction.Cureus · 2026Review
- The United States Leads the Globe in Venture Capital Funding for Orthopaedic Surgery.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Advances in New Alloys, Polymers and Composites for Biomedical Applications.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Stem cell dysfunction and rejuvenation strategies in ageing: emerging advances in regenerative medicine.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Recent Advances in Mechanobiology-Mediated In Situ Tissue Engineering.International journal of biomaterials · 2026Review
- Precise cell stratification in alginate/gelatin methacrylate based 3D construct using coaxial chaotic bioprinting.International journal of biological macromolecules · 2025Article
- Hydrogels from Renewable Resources: Advances in 3D Networks Based on Cellulose and Hemicellulose.Polymers · 2025Review
- Harnessing Regenerative Science in Aesthetic Surgery: The Biologically Driven Future.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Synthesis, Characterization, and Enzyme Conjugation of Polycaprolactone Nanofibers for Tissue Engineering.Pharmaceutics · 2025Article
- Article
- Safety and efficacy of bio-engineered, autologous dermo-epidermal skin grafts in reconstructive surgery: 1-year results of a prospective, randomized, intra-patient controlled, multicenter phase II clinical trial.Journal of tissue engineeringArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Tissue engineering represents a revolutionary approach in regenerative medicine, offering promising alternatives to traditional reconstructive techniques. This systematic review explores recent advances in tissue engineering, comparing their efficacy, postoperative outcomes, and patient satisfaction to conventional methods. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, covering studies published from 2000 to 2024. Fourteen studies were selected for final analysis based on inclusion criteria focusing on outcomes such as scar quality, postoperative pain, and patient satisfaction. The review demonstrated that tissue engineering techniques consistently provided superior cosmetic outcomes with minimal scarring compared to traditional methods. Patients undergoing tissue-engineered procedures experienced mild-to-moderate postoperative pain with rapid resolution, whereas traditional techniques resulted in moderate to severe pain requiring extended management. Furthermore, patients treated with tissue engineering reported high satisfaction rates due to improved cosmetic and functional outcomes. Despite challenges such as ensuring adequate vascularization, controlling scaffold degradation, and overcoming regulatory and cost barriers, ongoing research and development are essential to fully realize the potential of these innovative therapies. Tissue engineering offers significant advantages over traditional reconstructive techniques and has the potential to profoundly improve patient care in regenerative medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.