ArticleCureus2024
HyperAttention and Linformer-Based β-catenin Sequence Prediction For Bone Formation.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Beta (β)-catenin, a pivotal protein in bone development and homeostasis, is implicated in various bone disorders. Peptide-based therapeutics offer a promising approach due to their specificity and potential for reduced side effects. Attention networks are widely used for peptide sequence prediction, specifically sequence-to-sequence models. Hence, the current study aims to develop a HyperAttention and informatics-based β-catenin sequence prediction for bone formation. Methods β-catenin protein sequences were downloaded and quality-checked using UniProt and FASTA sequences using DeepBio (Deep Bio Inc., Seoul, South Korea) for predictive analysis. Data was analyzed for duplicates, outliers, and missing values. The data was then split into training and testing sets, with 80% of the data used for training and 20% for testing, and peptide sequences were encoded and subjected to algorithms. Results The HyperAttention and Linformer models perform well in predictive sequence, with HyperAttention correctly predicting 87% of instances and Linformer predicting 89%. Both models have higher sensitivity and specificity, with Linformer showing better identification of 91% of negative instances and slightly better sensitivity. Conclusion The HyperAttention and Linformer models effectively predict peptide sequences with high specificity and sensitivity. Further optimization and development are needed for optimal application and balance between positive and negative instances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.