Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376845›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

To Preserve or Not To Preserve: A Prospective Cohort Study on the Role of the Cervix in Post-Hysterectomy Sexual Functioning.

Mohamed Ferhi, Nadia Marwen, Ameni Abdeljabbar, Jihenne Mannai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohamed FerhiPsychiatry, Ibn El Jazzar University Hospital, Kairouan, TUN.
Nadia MarwenObstetrics and Gynecology, Ibn El Jazzar University Hospital, Kairouan, TUN.
Ameni AbdeljabbarObstetrics and Gynecology, Ibn El Jazzar University Hospital, Kairouan, TUN.
Jihenne MannaiPsychiatry, Ibn El Jazzar University Hospital, Kairouan, TUN.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Hysterectomy remains the most commonly performed gynecologic procedure worldwide, undertaken primarily for benign pathologies. The choice between total hysterectomy (TH) and subtotal hysterectomy (STH) has been debated, particularly with respect to its impact on sexual functioning (SF). Objective This study aimed to assess the impact of TH versus STH on SF and to determine whether preservation of the cervix in STH offers advantages in terms of postoperative SF. Methods A prospective cohort study was conducted at Ibn El Jazzar University Hospital, Kairouan, Tunisia, involving women aged 40 to 65 years who underwent hysterectomy for benign conditions between January 2, 2020, and December 31, 2021. SF was evaluated using the Arizona Sexual Experiences Scale (ASEX) and the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI) before and six months after surgery. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 26. Results Sixty women were included, with 30 undergoing TH and 30 undergoing STH. Postoperative evaluations revealed improvements in SF in both groups without statistically significant differences between TH and STH in terms of SF scores or the timeline for resuming sexual activity. Conclusions Hysterectomy, regardless of the technique used, appears to have a positive impact on SF, largely attributed to symptomatic relief. Therefore, the choice between TH and STH should consider factors beyond potential differences in SF outcomes. Women considering hysterectomy for benign indications should be informed of these findings to aid in the decision-making process regarding their surgical options.

Indexed as

asexfemale sexual healthfemale sexualityfsfihysterectomyorgasmprospective cohortpsychiatric effectssexual desiretotal hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID39376845
PMCPMC11457895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.