ArticleCureus2024
Evaluating the Efficacy of Facial Scar Treatment Techniques Using Nanofat Grafting: A Case Series.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Autologous Nanofat Indications in Wound Healing: A Systematic Review.Biomedicines · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patient's psychological and aesthetic quality is affected by the appearance of scars since atrophic scars might be caused by infections or inflammations that resulted from preoperative procedures. Non-surgical methods have recently been developed to increase patient satisfaction and improve the appearance of scars. In our understanding, there has not been much published medical research assessing how well nanofat grafting techniques work in terms of treating facial scars. With a six-month follow-up after the intervention, this research intends to provide four cases where scars in the facial area were controlled utilizing these materials. Based on the cases shown, it can be seen that following the procedure, the scar's measurements were minimized, its color and texture improved, and there was no pain or itching. Given its safety and effectiveness, autologous nanofat grafting has become one of the most important and well-liked aesthetic procedures. It has been discussed how modifying injectable nanofat using fine needles has opened up new clinical applications for rejuvenating aesthetic medicine. Additionally, it was pointed out that injectable PRF has gained attention due to its high concentration of growth factors, which help to promote healing and improve the appearance of the skin. Furthermore, it can be efficiently shared with autogenous nanofat grafts, which support and enhance the efficacy of adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) and improve adipocyte blood circulation. The current use of modified nanofat in the treatment of facial scars is supported by the procedure's safety and low risk of injection-site problems. The consistent efficacy of modified-nanofat injection in the management of depression-related facial scars was validated by the outcomes of patient satisfaction surveys and physician evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.