Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376838›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Gallbladder Polyps: Is It Overtreatment?

Yalçın Burak Kara, Yahya Ozel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yalçın Burak KaraDepartment of General Surgery, Bahcesehir University School of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR.
Yahya OzelGeneral Surgery, Dogus University School of Medicine, Istanbul, TUR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gallbladder polyp (GP) is an accepted risk factor of gallbladder cancer and an indication for laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Generally, the pathologic result of GPs is benign, but it is difficult to distinguish a potential malignancy or a stone without pathological evaluation. This study compared the indication and pathologic result of cholecystectomy performed due to GP in our clinic. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis study employed retrospective data analysis. Patients who underwent LC from August 2021 through August 2024 were included in the study. Demographic features, operation status, indications for surgery, hospital stay, concomitant surgery, pathologic outcomes, and complications were recorded from patients' data. Polyp sizes and number of polyps were taken from ultrasonography (USG) data.

resultsA total of 533 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 44.31 ± 12.14, and 64.35% (n = 343) were of female gender. Twenty patients (3.75%) underwent surgery for GP. The mean polyp size was 7.47 mm (2-15); 65% of the patients (n = 13) had multiple polyps, and 35% (n = 7) had a single polyp. The mean hospital stay was 1.59 ± 0.88 days. The pathologic result of GP was pseudopolyp in 55% (n = 11) of cases and non-polyp in 45% (n = 9). One patient (0.18%) who underwent an operation for gallstone had a malignancy. The sensitivity of USG in detecting polyps was found to be 64.7%. The complication rate was 1.5% (n = 8).

conclusionThe pathological result of many patients who undergo cholecystectomy due to GPs is pseudopolyp or adenoma. In our study, no carcinoma was observed in any patient who underwent surgery for polyps. Further studies are needed to determine the indication for surgery due to GP.

Indexed as

benign polypcholecystectomygallbladder cancergallbladder polypspseudopolyps

Identifiers

PMID39376838
PMCPMC11456772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.