Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376830›Full record

ArticleCureus2024

Enhanced Pharmacy Service Delivery Through a Pharmacy Information System at a Medical Center: A Case Study.

Sarah M Alanazi, Abdullah T Alanazi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sarah M AlanaziCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.
Abdullah T AlanaziCollege of Public Health and Health Informatics, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionA pharmacy information system (PIS) is a crucial tool for preventing errors and enhancing patient safety. This study aims to assess the influence of a PIS on workflow and medication errors (MEs) within the pharmacy department of a medical city in Saudi Arabia. The analysis encompasses an evaluation of the current workflow within pharmacy modules (in-patient, out-patient, and clinical pharmacy modules) and an exploration of associated challenges and inefficiencies.

methodThe study employed both qualitative and quantitative methodologies, incorporating structured interview techniques and the review of system records, such as logs, incident reports, and ME databases.

resultsRespondents recognized the benefits of the PIS, including the management of high-quality real-time data (26%), reduction of MEs (25%), acceleration of healthcare practices (23%), and absence of space-time constraints (14%). The study highlighted the role of PIS in addressing medication stock control and shortage issues, thereby improving overall medication availability. Furthermore, PIS significantly enhanced safety (93.3%), efficiency (80%), reliability, accuracy, ease of use (56.7%, 56.7%), and cost-effectiveness (53.7%). Following the implementation of the PIS, there was an increase in ME reporting, indicating improved error detection and management.

conclusionThe research revealed an increase in ME reporting rates in hospitals after PIS installation, attributed to improved medication management processes resulting in higher detection rates. As healthcare facilities increasingly embrace electronic medical records, the understanding of patient care quality will be significantly impacted. Consequently, further research is warranted to explore the role of PIS in reporting, detecting, analyzing, and mitigating MEs, as well as their influence on the work environment to promote a secure and efficient patient journey.

Indexed as

errorsmedicationpharmacy information systempisuse of information

Identifiers

PMID39376830
PMCPMC11457706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.