ArticleJournal of maxillofacial and oral surgery2024
Shame and Stigma Over Long-Term Survival in Postoperative Cases of Head and Neck Cancer.
Article in Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Navigating fatherhood and identity reconstruction among fathers with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A qualitative study.Asia-Pacific journal of oncology nursing · 2026Article
- Endoscope-assisted transoral removal of benign midline cervical neoplasms: A preliminary study.Oral and maxillofacial surgery · 2026Article
- Matrix Metalloproteinases (MMPs) as Novel Prognostic Biomarkers to Predict Disease Progression, Survival Duration, and Recurrence Rate in Oral Cancer Patients.Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Review
- Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) Expression and Its Prognostic Significance in Oral Cancer Patients.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2025Article
- Diagnostic and Prognostic Accuracy of MMPs and TIMPs in Oral Cancer Patients on Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) as Compared to Immunohistochemistry (IHC).Indian journal of surgical oncology · 2025Article
- Serum Concentration of MMP-9 as a Predictive Biomarker for the Progression of Oral Cancer.Journal of maxillofacial and oral surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Surgical excision of the tumor remains the primary choice for the treatment of head and neck cancer patients, but it often leads to facial disfigurement, which further causes mutilation in the patients. Mutilation causes shame and stigma, which imparts significant psychological strain on patients, and tends to impair their quality of life. Objective: The present study aimed to assess the shame and stigma over long-term postoperative survival duration in head and neck cancer patients. Methodology: Total 100 postoperative patients of head and neck cancer were recruited from the outpatient department of the host institute, and shame and stigma was assessed using the Hindi version of the shame and stigma scale. Results: The global shame and stigma score was 22.67 ± 16.22, with the highest perceived stigma due to changes in appearance (11.94 ± 8.805), followed by impaired speech (4.490 ± 3.243), feeling of regret (3.950 ± 3.313), and feeling of stigma (4.490 ± 3.243). The shame and stigma was found to be significantly higher in maxillary cancer patients (33.22 ± 16.60), followed by larynx cancer patients (22.06 ± 13.41) and oral cancer patients (21.53 ± 16.49). Patients with stage III and stage IV of cancer were found to perceive higher shame and stigma (35.91 ± 22.23 and 27.36 ± 14.71, respectively) compared to the patients having stage I and stage II cancer (9.583 ± 9.709 and 16.44 ± 11.82, respectively). A significantly declining linear trend was found between shame and stigma and postoperative survival duration. Conclusion: We concluded that shame and stigma act as important determinants of quality of life over long-term survival in head and neck cancer patients, and should be considered while designing psychological interventions and surgical reconstruction protocols. The present study will help clinicians to assess the mutilation among head and neck cancer patients in a better way and will help in devising new psychological strategies to manage psychological aspects associated with mutilation, which will ultimately enhance the quality of life of patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.