ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2024
Psychometric Properties of Different Short Forms of Social Interaction Anxiety Scale in Chinese College Students.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bidirectional associations between parental-child alienation and social anxiety: a longitudinal study on the mediating role of interpersonal sensitivity.BMC psychology · 2026Article
- An avoidance trap? Within-person dynamics between social interaction anxiety and the tendency to avoid physical activity and sport among Chinese university students: a four-wave random-intercept cross-lagged panel study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There exist four short forms of the Social Interaction Anxiety Scale (SIAS): 10-item version (SIAS-10), 6-item version by Peters et al (SIAS-6P), 6-item version by Fergus et al (SIAS-6F), and 5-item version (SIAS-5). This study aims to comprehensively examine the psychometric properties of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, and SIAS-5 and to determine which one performs relatively better in Chinese population. Methods: This study enrolled 733 Chinese college students. The unidimensionality of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, SIAS-5 was examined using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Multi-Group CFA was further adopted to assess measurement equivalence across gender. Internal consistency reliability and criteria-related validity were also evaluated. Additionally, the measurement performance of the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F, and SIAS-5 was assessed with Item Response Theory (IRT), which estimated the discrimination parameter and the Item Characteristic Curve (ICC) for each item. Results: Except for the SIAS-5, the SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, and SIAS-6F displayed a good-fit to the one-factor model. Furthermore, the SIAS-10 achieved strict equivalence across gender while other versions did not. The SIAS-10, SIAS-6P, SIAS-6F and SIAS-5 all had acceptable internal consistency and significant correlations with criteria scales. The IRT results showed that the SIAS-10 included more items with higher discrimination and peaked ICCs (indicating more informative), whereas the SIAS-6P included more items with lower discrimination and flat ICCs (indicating less informative). Conclusion: For assessing social anxiety in Chinese under constrained conditions, the SIAS-10 is recommended to clinicians for it measuring equivalently across gender, reflecting the relevant criteria variables well, and discriminating various levels of social anxiety sensitively.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.