Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376699›Full record

ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2024

Silane and acid etch cross contamination of dentin and composite reduced µ-tensile bond strength.

Sigfus Thor Eliasson, Jon Einar Dahl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sigfus Thor EliassonNordic Institute of Dental Materials, Oslo, Norway.
Jon Einar DahlNordic Institute of Dental Materials, Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate whether acid etch contamination of silane-treated composite influenced repair bond strength and whether silane contamination on dentin influenced composite bond strength to dentin. Materials and methods: Forty composite blocks stored in water for 4 weeks were divided into four groups. Specimens in groups 1-3 were coated with Bis-Silane and contaminated with acid etch + water spray (group 1) or water spray (group 2). Group 3 was not contaminated. Group 4 was untreated. The occlusal third of 60 third molars was cut off, ground flat, and divided into three groups. After etching, the surfaces in groups A and B were contaminated with Bis-silane. The contaminated surfaces in group A were re-etched.Each composite repair group and composite-dentin group was divided into two subgroups receiving Adper Scotchbond 1 XT or Clearfil SE Bond 2 adhesives followed by a composite build up. After ageing for 3 months, specimens were sectioned into 1.1 mm × 1.1 mm rods for tensile testing and strength calculated at fracture. The fracture was examined using microscope. Results: Bis-Silane surface treatment increased the repair bond strength. Contamination with acid reduced the strength of the repair bond. Similar results were obtained for both adhesives. Tooth surface contamination with silane reduced the bond strength between dentin and composite. Additional acid etching or water spray on silane contaminated dentin did not influence the weakened bond strength. Most fractures were adhesive type. Conclusions: Silane contamination on etched dentin and acid etch contamination on silanized composite surfaces significantly reduced tensile bond strength.

Indexed as

Adhesiverepair of restorationstensile testing

Identifiers

PMID39376699
PMCPMC11457355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.