ReviewEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2024
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyrimethanil.
Review in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The 2024 European Union report on pesticide residues in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Analysis and Risk Assessment of Pesticide Residues in Strawberry Using the PRIMo Model: Detection, Public Health and Safety Implications.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Prioritization and Sensitivity of Pesticide Risks from Root and Tuber Vegetables.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- Pesticide Surveillance in Fruits and Vegetables from Romanian Supply: A Data-Driven Approach.Journal of xenobiotics · 2025Article
- A proposal of criteria to support the EU classification on endocrine disruption for the thyroid modality and their application to four data-rich case studies.Archives of toxicology · 2025Article
- Personal air sampling for pesticides in the California San Joaquin Valley.Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2025Article
- Possible Genotoxic Effects of Post-Harvest Fungicides Applied on Citrus Peels: Imazalil, Pyrimethanil, Thiabendazole and Their Mixtures.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance pyrimethanil.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Review
- Modification of the existing maximum residue level for pyrimethanil in cucurbits with edible peel.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2018Article
- Modification of the existing maximum residue level for pyrimethanil in leek.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
53 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The conclusions of the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State Czech Republic and co-rapporteur Member State Austria for the pesticide active substance pyrimethanil and of confirmatory data following the maximum residue limit (MRL) review under Article 12 of Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012, as amended by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2018/1659. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of pyrimethanil as a fungicide on grapevine and pome fruit (field uses), strawberry and lettuce (field and greenhouse uses). The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.