Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376677›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2024

Application of different CO

Yan Peng, Min Zhu, Chunmei Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yan Peng *Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Min Zhu *Department of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Chunmei ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is a minimally invasive approach for the therapy of infant ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO), reliant on CO Methods: This prospective randomized controlled trial included infants with UPJO undergoing laparoscopic pyeloplasty. Patients were allocated to low pneumoperitoneum pressure (LPP, 5 mmHg) or high pneumoperitoneum pressure (HPP, 8 mmHg) groups. Surgical parameters, postoperative complications, acid-base balance, stress markers, inflammatory cytokines, and oxidative stress markers were evaluated and compared. Results: A total of 116 infants were analyzed. Preoperative characteristics were comparable between LPP and HPP groups. No significant differences in blood loss, operation time, or hospitalization time were observed. Postoperative complications were similar between groups. Acid-base balance analysis revealed a decrease in pH after pneumoperitoneum in both groups, with greater reductions in actual base excess and standard base excess in the HPP group. Stress markers, cytokines, and oxidative stress markers increased postoperatively in both groups, with higher levels in the HPP group. Conclusion: HPP leads to more pronounced physiological responses, including acid-base alterations, stress reactions, and inflammatory cytokine elevations.

Indexed as

CO2cytokinelaparoscopic pyeloplastypneumoperitoneum insufflationureteropelvic junction obstruction

Identifiers

PMID39376677
PMCPMC11456519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.