ArticleResuscitation plus2024
Approaches to neonatal intubation training: A scoping review.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Singapore Neonatal Resuscitation Guidelines 2026.Singapore medical journal · 2026Guideline
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 9. Neonatal resuscitation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Guideline
- Respiratory support during endotracheal intubation to improve intubation success in neonates.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2026Pooled it
- Non-Invasive respiratory support during elective intubation in preterm infants-a randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2025Trial
- Neonatal endotracheal intubation: development of a comprehensive educational program for procedural skills.Pediatric research · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Neonatal intubation is a lifesaving skill that a variety of clinicians need to establish as it can be required anywhere babies are born or hospitalised and cannot depend on the immediate availability of an experienced senior clinician. However, neonatal intubation is complex and risky, requiring technical and non-technical skill competence. Studies report that rates of successful neonatal intubation by junior clinicians are low, providing a mandate to examine the best methods to improve skill acquisition, retention, and transfer. Method: We utilised PRISMA-ScR methodology to capture the range of training approaches in the simulation and clinical settings, and to assess the range of technical and non-technical skill outcome measures that were used in the included studies. Databases were searched from inception to August 2024 to identify studies reporting outcomes for medical practitioners-in-training, nurses, and nurse practitioners. Identified studies meeting inclusion criteria underwent data charting with study characteristics tabulated. Results: Twenty-six studies (involving 1449 participants) were included. Training methodology was diverse and included self-directed learning, didactic education, demonstration, simulation-based training (SBT), instructor feedback, debriefing and supervised clinical practice. Most of the studies (96 %) used multiple training methods with education and SBT most frequently used. Thirteen studies reported outcomes in clinical settings, including seven that demonstrated changes in technical skills following education and SBT. Two studies that assessed transfer of skills failed to show successful transfer from simulation to a clinical setting. Two articles reported the transfer of skills between direct and video laryngoscope devices. Only one study evaluated skill retention (at 6-9 months) but did not demonstrate proficiency after initial training or at follow up. No studies described the effects of training on non-technical skills. Conclusion: No included studies or combination of studies seems likely to provide a high-certainty evidence-basis for optimal training methodology. Results suggested using a training bundle including education, SBT and supervision. Knowledge gaps remain, including the most effective methodology for non-technical skill training. In addition, the evidence of technical skill retention beyond the immediate training episode, and transfer to a variety of clinical environments is very limited. Given the importance of successful neonatal intubation, more research in these areas is justified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.