ArticleBiologics : targets & therapy2024
Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Tocilizumab in a Cohort of Patients with Giant Cell Arteritis: An Italian Monocentric Retrospective Study.
Article in Biologics : targets & therapy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Tocilizumab (TCZ) is the only biologic drug approved for the treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA), having clinical trials and real-life studies proved its efficacy and safety. However, the optimal duration of the treatment has yet to be determined, being its early interruption associated with an increased risk of relapse. Conversely, prolonged schemes of therapy may rise safety concerns. The aim of the study was to evaluate the incidence of adverse events (AEs) and remission/relapse rate in a cohort of GCA patients treated with TCZ and an accelerated steroid tapering scheme, followed for 24 months. Methods: We retrospectively included patients referring to our clinic from January 2019 to November 2021 who were diagnosed with GCA and started subcutaneous TCZ treatment (162 mg/week). They also received up to 62,5 mg of prednisone (PDN), tapered following an accelerated six-month scheme. Results: We collected 38 patients, with a mean age of 76,4 years, treated with TCZ for an average of 22,3 months. AEs occurred in 11 (29%) subjects, and only one serious AE was reported; 7 (18%) patients permanently discontinued TCZ. At the end of the follow-up, all the patients continuing treatment showed clinical remission, with a PDN dosage <5mg. We registered 3 (8%) minor relapses under TCZ, after an average of 15 months. Conclusion: Our data support the evidence of a safe and effective long-term use of TCZ in GCA patients, especially when combined with moderate GCs doses for the shortest possible duration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.