ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2024
Neuroprotective effects of ellorarxine in neuronal models of degeneration.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Comparative Study of a Potent CNS-Permeable RARβ-Modulator, Ellorarxine, in Neurons, Glia and Microglia Cells In Vitro.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Retinoic acid (RA) was first recognised to be important for the central nervous system (CNS) in its developmental regulatory role and, given this action, it has been proposed in the adult CNS to regulate plasticity and promote regeneration. These types of roles have included support of neurogenesis, induction of neurite outgrowth, and protection from neuronal death. These functions are predominantly mediated by the retinoic acid receptor (RAR) transcription factor, and hence agonists for the RARs have been tested in a variety of models of neurodegeneration. This present study employs several Methods: A series of assays are used in which neuronal cells are placed under the types of stress that have been linked to neurodegeneration, in particular amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and the neuroprotective influence of a new potent agonist for RAR, ellorarxine, is tested out. In these assays, neuronal cells were subjected to excitotoxic stress induced by glutamate, proteostasis disruption caused by epoxomicin, and oxidative stress leading to stress granule formation triggered by sodium arsenite. Results: Ellorarxine effectively reversed neuronal death in excitotoxic and proteostasis disruption assays and mitigated stress granule formation induced by sodium arsenite. This study also highlights for the first time the novel observation of RAR modulation of stress granules, although it is unknown whether this change in stress granules will be neuroprotective or potentially regenerative. Furthermore, the distribution of RAR agonists following intraperitoneal injection was assessed in mice, revealing preferential accumulation in the central nervous system, particularly in the spinal cord, compared to the liver. Gene expression studies in the spinal cord demonstrated that ellorarxine induces transcriptional changes at a low dose (0.01 mg/kg). Discussion: These findings underscore the therapeutic potential of RAR agonists, such as ellorarxine, for ALS and potentially other neurodegenerative diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.