ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2024
Potentially Risk Factors for New Atrial Fibrillation in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Our study evaluated the risk factors for new postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) by analyzing the data collected from patients who underwent first coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: Our study retrospectively collected data from January 2021 to December 2023 at Changzhi People's Hospital. The perioperative period data were collected, and logistic regression was used to analyze the independent predictors of the occurrence of POAF after CABG and the related predictive values of risk factors were analyzed by using the subjects' work characteristic curve (ROC). Results: A total of 169 patients were included, and there are 45 patients in the POAF group, with an incidence of 26.6%, and 124 in the non-POAF group. The POAF group was significantly higher than the non-POAF group in terms of age (69.2±8.8 years vs 62.3±9.3 years) and preoperative LAD (42.7±7.2mm vs 36.8±5.5mm), and the difference was significant (P<0.05). Preoperative HDL-C in the POAF group were lower than non-POAF group (1.0±0.5 mmol/l vs 1.4±0.7 mmol/l, P<0.05). The logistic regression analysis revealed a significant correlation between age, LAD, HDL-C and the occurrence of POAF (P<0.05). According to the ROC curve analysis, age >64.5 years, LAD >41mm, and HDL-C <0.9 mmol/l were the cut-off values for predicting the occurrence of POAF (AUC1=0.733; AUC2=0.741; AUC3=0.647, P < 0.05). The combined age + LAD + HDL-C (AUC = 0.755; P < 0.05) had a higher diagnostic value and high sensitivity. Conclusion: The age, LAD, and HDL-C are independent risk factors for the POAF after CABG, and clinicians should assess these risk factors as much as possible when managing patients in the perioperative period and make corresponding measures to prevent the development of POAF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.