Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376489›Full record

ReviewBeilstein journal of organic chemistry2024

Machine learning-guided strategies for reaction conditions design and optimization.

Lung-Yi Chen, Yi-Pei Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Beilstein journal of organic chemistry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Considerations in Pursuing Reaction Scope Generality.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Application of Transformers to Chemical Synthesis.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  11. Adaptive experimentation and optimization in organic chemistry.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lung-Yi ChenDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9411-6404
Yi-Pei LiDepartment of Chemical Engineering, National Taiwan University, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 10617, Taiwan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1314-3276

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review surveys the recent advances and challenges in predicting and optimizing reaction conditions using machine learning techniques. The paper emphasizes the importance of acquiring and processing large and diverse datasets of chemical reactions, and the use of both global and local models to guide the design of synthetic processes. Global models exploit the information from comprehensive databases to suggest general reaction conditions for new reactions, while local models fine-tune the specific parameters for a given reaction family to improve yield and selectivity. The paper also identifies the current limitations and opportunities in this field, such as the data quality and availability, and the integration of high-throughput experimentation. The paper demonstrates how the combination of chemical engineering, data science, and ML algorithms can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of reaction conditions design, and enable novel discoveries in synthetic chemistry.

Indexed as

data preprocessingreaction conditions predictionreaction data miningreaction optimizationreaction representation

Identifiers

PMID39376489
PMCPMC11457048

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.