ArticleObstetrics and gynecology international2024
The Effect of "Motivational Interviewing" and "Information, Motivation, and Behavioral Skills Model" Counseling Interventions on the Choice of Delivery Mode in Pregnant Women Using Face-to-Face Training vs. Mobile App: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Article in Obstetrics and gynecology international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of counseling interventions, using face-to-face training vs. mobile app for choosing mode of delivery. Design: A four-armed, randomized, controlled parallel-design trial. Methods: Pregnant women were randomly assigned in three psycho-educational intervention groups: (1) motivational interviewing via face-to-face training, (2) information, motivation, and behavioral skills model via face-to-face training, (3) the same model via a mobile application, and (4) usual antenatal care (control group). To assess the face-to-face and mobile app training method on women's self-efficacy and intention in choosing a mode of delivery. Results: While all three intervention groups showed significant increases in women's self-efficacy and intentions to choose vaginal delivery, the increase was particularly noticeable among those using mobile applications: Before the intervention, self-efficacy and intention Mean ± SD were 77.1 ± 38.6 (CI-95%: [62.72, 91.60]) and 1.10 ± 0.305 (CI-95%: [0.99, 1.21]), respectively. After the intervention, these scores increased to 99.7 ± 30.7 (CI-95%: [88.27, 111.20]) for self-efficacy and 1.70 ± 0.466 (CI-95%: [1.53, 1.87]) for intention. Although 56.7% of women in the intervention groups expressed a preference for vaginal delivery, only 37.5% ultimately pursued this birthing method. Conclusions: Brief psycho-educational interventions, particularly technology-driven interventions (mobile apps) can increase the likelihood of women choosing vaginal delivery. To enhance the effectiveness of such interventions, they can be conducted in conjunction with interventions for doctors and healthcare providers. This trial is registered with IRCT20151208025431N7.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.