Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376478›Full record

ArticleClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR2024

Improving Adherence and Reducing Health Care Costs Through Blister-Packaging: An Economic Model for a Commercially Insured Health Plan.

Eric P Borrelli, Peter Saad, Nathan E Barnes, Doina Dumitru, Julia D Lucaci

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07555093 (A Randomized Controlled Trial in Lombok), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07555093 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

A Randomized Controlled Trial in Lombok: Assessing Factors Influencing Acceptance and Adherence to Multiple Micronutrient Supplementation (MMS) Using Digital Tools

TypeinterventionalSponsorSummit Institute for Development, IndonesiaRan2026 to 2027Enrolled10,012ConditionsPregnancy, AdherenceArmsBottle pack, Blister pack, Standard Care, Digital care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric P BorrelliHealth Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR), Becton, Dickinson and Company, San Diego, CA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9941-9893
Peter SaadMedical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Durham, NC, USA.
Nathan E BarnesMedical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, Durham, NC, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-9135-5397
Doina DumitruMedical Affairs, Becton, Dickinson and Company, San Diego, CA, USA.
Julia D LucaciHealth Economics & Outcomes Research (HEOR), Becton, Dickinson and Company, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-9002-4600

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To model the potential clinical and economic impact of blister-packaging medications for chronic conditions on medication adherence and healthcare costs in a commercially insured population. Methods: A health economic model was developed to evaluate the potential impact of blister-packaging chronic medications for a commercially insured population. The chronic medication classes assessed were renin-angiotensin-system (RAS) antagonists, statins, non-insulin oral antidiabetics, and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The model was designed to reflect the perspective of a hypothetical commercially insured health plan with 100,000 members, over a one-year time horizon. Literature-based or best available epidemiologic references were used to inform the number of patients utilizing each medication class, the impact of blister-packaging on the number of patients who become adherent, as well as the impact of medication adherence in a commercially insured population on healthcare costs for each medication class assessed. Impact on costs was measured in total net healthcare costs, as well as being stratified by medical costs and medication costs. Results: Following the blister-packaging intervention, there were an additional 591 patients adherent to RAS antagonists, 1196 patients adherent to statins, 169 patients adherent to oral antidiabetics, and 25 patients adherent to DOACs. While pharmacy costs increased, these costs were more than offset by the reduction in medical costs. Overall, the increase in patients adherent to therapy due to blister-packaging led to a reduction in total healthcare costs of $879,312 for RAS antagonists (-$0.73 per-member per-month (PMPM)), $343,322 for statins (-$0.29 PMPM), $78,917 for oral antidiabetics (-$0.07 PMPM), and $120,793 for DOACs (-$0.10 PMPM). Conclusion: Blister-packaging chronic medications in a commercially insured population has the potential to reduce healthcare costs. Future research is needed to confirm these findings in real-world settings and to fully understand the clinical and economic implications of blister-packaging chronic medications.

Indexed as

blister-packagingblister-packinghealthcare costsmedical cost offsetsmedication adherencemedication adherence packagingself-insuredtotal cost of care

Identifiers

PMID39376478
PMCPMC11457784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.