ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024
Olfactory Function and Surgery of the Lateral Nasal Wall - Systematic Review.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to comprehend the influence of surgery on the lateral nasal wall, primarily focusing on the inferior turbinates, and its impact on olfactory function. A systematic review was carried out utilizing electronic databases like PubMed, Cochrane (including various registers and databases), and Web of Science. No restrictions were imposed on publication year or language. The PRISMA criteria guided study selection, and predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were employed. Risk of bias assessment for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) utilized the "Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2)," while Hawker et al. scale evaluated the quality of non-RCT studies. The review encompassed nine studies after rigorous selection and bias assessment. All studies unanimously demonstrated improved olfactory function following surgery on the inferior turbinate. Different surgical techniques and olfactory assessment methods were employed across studies. Evaluation encompassed pre- and post-surgery olfactory measurements. Most studies employed the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and commercial smell test kits (like Sniffin' Stick Test). The Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale was used in two studies, and the butanol threshold test in one. Olfactory improvement was measured through enhanced patient numbers or nasal cavities, often expressed via VAS scores. One study utilized both patient count and VAS scores. A few studies also employed NOSE scale and olfactory threshold measurements. All studies consistently concluded that olfactory function post-surgery was superior to preoperative measures. The collective evidence strongly suggests that surgery on inferior turbinates has a positive impact on olfactory function, as indicated by the studies reviewed. Nonetheless, for a comprehensive understanding of surgical efficacy, future research should incorporate randomized controlled trials featuring control groups. This would facilitate the establishment of optimal surgical techniques for specific indications and the formulation of practical guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.