ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024
Clinical Study and Management of Epistaxis.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Epistaxis is the most common emergency in otorhinolaryngology affecting up to 60% of the population in their lifetime. There are various local and systemic cause and includes both medical and surgical management. This study has been undertaken to study various etiopathogenesis and management of epistaxis. This is a prospective hospital-based study conducted on 100 patients of all age groups and both genders presenting with epistaxis to the Department of Otorhinolaryngology both on outpatient and inpatient basis. A detailed history taking with clinical examination is done. Data is entered in a structured performa, master chart prepared and is subjected to statistical analysis by SPSS software version 23. The most common age group was first decade (26%) followed by fourth decade (15%) with male (71%) predominance. Anterior epistaxis (87%) and bilateral nasal cavity involvement (65%) was predominantly seen. Most common causes for epistaxis are trauma (20%) followed by nasal infections (18%) and hypertension (17%). Majority of the patients underwent medical line of treatment (80%) followed by anterior nasal packing (12%), surgical intervention (7%), posterior nasal packing (1%). Epistaxis needs immediate restoration of hemodynamic parameters with first aid, airway assessment and control of bleeding. Majority of the cases were managed conservatively which is safe and cost effective method. Patients should be advised to avoid strenuous activity, nose picking and vigorous nose blowing. Severe recurrent epistaxis needed invasive interventions like nasal packing and blood transfusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.