ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024
Transforming ENT Healthcare: Advancements and Implications of Artificial Intelligence.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Reflections from 2096: the future of head and neck surgery.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This systematic literature review aims to study the role and impact of artificial intelligence (AI) in transforming Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) healthcare. It aims to compare and analyse literature that applied AI algorithms for ENT disease prediction and detection based on their effectiveness, methods, dataset, and performance. We have also discussed ENT specialists' challenges and AI's role in solving them. This review also discusses the challenges faced by AI researchers. This systematic review was completed using PRISMA guidelines. Data was extracted from several reputable digital databases, including PubMed, Medline, SpringerLink, Elsevier, Google Scholar, ScienceDirect, and IEEExplore. The search criteria included studies recently published between 2018 and 2024 related to the application of AI for ENT healthcare. After removing duplicate studies and quality assessments, we reviewed eligible articles and responded to the research questions. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of AI applications in ENT healthcare. Among the 3257 unique studies, 27 were selected as primary studies. About 62.5% of the included studies were effective in providing disease predictions. We found that Pretrained DL models are more in application than CNN algorithms when employed for ENT disease predictions. The accuracy of models ranged between 75 and 97%. We also observed the effectiveness of conversational AI models such as ChatGPT in the ENT discipline. The research in AI for ENT is advancing rapidly. Most of the models have achieved accuracy above 90%. However, the lack of good-quality data and data variability limits the overall ability of AI models to perform better for ENT disease prediction. Further research needs to be conducted while considering factors such as external validation and the issue of class imbalance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.