Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39376307›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024

Comparative Study on Finger Gloves Nasal Packing Vs Merocel Nasal Packing After Intranasal Surgery: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Govindarajan Arumugam, Gopalakrishnan Surianarayanan, Karthikeyan Padmanabhan, Parvathy Vidyan, Kirubhagaran Ravichandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effect of nasal retainer versus doyle nasal packing on postoperative comfort and complications following septorhinoplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Govindarajan ArumugamDepartment of ENT, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pillaiyarkuppam, 607402 Pondicherry India.
Gopalakrishnan SurianarayananDepartment of ENT, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pillaiyarkuppam, 607402 Pondicherry India.
Karthikeyan PadmanabhanDepartment of ENT, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pillaiyarkuppam, 607402 Pondicherry India.
Parvathy VidyanDepartment of ENT, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pillaiyarkuppam, 607402 Pondicherry India.
Kirubhagaran RavichandranDepartment of ENT, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College and Research Institute, Sri Balaji Vidyapeeth, Pillaiyarkuppam, 607402 Pondicherry India.ORCID 0009-0003-0278-5948

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nasal packing is one of the common procedures done following various intranasal surgeries in order to prevent the various complications that can arise post-operatively. Some of the complications noted include bleeding from the nose, septal hematoma, septal abscess and formation of mucosal adhesions. There are different types of nasal packing materials available. Few of the commonly used nasal packing material are ribbon gauzes impregnated with antibiotics, merocel, gel foam, glove fingers and Vaseline gauze. This study compared the effectiveness of Merocel nasal packing with Glove finger nasal packing after Septoplasty and Polypectomy. Merocel, a widely used expandable non-absorbable material, was compared with conventional ribbon gauze packs inserted into glove fingers. Results showed no significant differences in post-operative bleeding, pain, discomfort, mucociliary clearance, or late complications between the two groups. However, a slightly earlier return of mucociliary clearance in patients packed with Glove finger nasal packs was observed. Therefore, it can be concluded that both Merocel and Glove finger nasal packs are equally effective in managing post-operative complications following these procedures.

Indexed as

Finger glove nasal packingFunctional endoscopic sinus surgeryMerocel packingSeptoplastySeptorhinoplasty

Identifiers

PMID39376307
PMCPMC11455776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.