ArticleIndian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India2024
Routine Histopathology of Tonsillectomy Specimens, Is It Necessary? A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Routine histopathology of tonsillectomy specimens is not standard practice due to cost and resource constraints. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of abnormal histopathologies in tonsillectomy specimens to determine the necessity of routine histopathology. A prospective observational study was conducted from January 2014 to August 2016 at a general tertiary care center after approval of Institutional Ethics Committee (IEC). Patients scheduled for tonsillectomy surgery as per the AAOHNS 2011 criteria were included in the study. All tonsillectomy specimens were sent for histopathology, and abnormal findings were documented. Statistical analysis was performed. A total of 111 patients were enrolled in this study, and 222 tonsillectomy specimens were analyzed. The most common finding was chronic tonsillitis, which justified the selection criteria in 91.89% of patients. Two patients with chronic tonsillitis were also found to have actinomycosis present on the surface without parenchymal tissue reaction. Abnormal histopathological findings were observed in 9 (8.10%) of patients, leading to further investigations or treatment in 8 cases. These abnormalities included chronic granuloma, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, early squamous cell carcinoma, and one choristoma. Tonsillar asymmetry, recent onset of symptoms and older age were found to be significantly correlated with abnormal histopathology and malignancy. Routine histopathology in tonsillectomy specimens helps to identify important findings that may require additional treatment. Based on the study we strongly recommend routine histopathology of tonsillectomy specimen. When significant cost constraints exist, risk-based approach can be adopted. Factors such as older age, asymmetry of tonsils, referred otalgia, duration of symptoms (recent onset) and a history of addiction should be considered for proceeding with histopathology. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12070-024-04888-1.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.