ArticleBioinformatics and biology insights2024
A Strategy to Compare Single-Cell RNA Sequencing Data Sets Provides Phenotypic Insight into Cellular Heterogeneity Underlying Biological Similarities and Differences Between Samples.
Article in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence and machine learning-assisted digital applications for biopharmaceutical manufacturing.Biotechnology progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) allows for an unbiased assessment of cellular phenotypes by enabling the extraction of transcriptomic data. An important question in downstream analysis is how to evaluate biological similarities and differences between samples in high dimensional space. This becomes especially complex when there is cellular heterogeneity within the samples. Here, we present scCompare, a computational pipeline for comparison of scRNA-seq data sets. Phenotypic identities from a known data set are transferred onto another data set using correlation-based mapping to average transcriptomic signatures from each cluster of cells' annotated phenotype. Statistically derived lower cutoffs for phenotype inclusivity allow for cells to be unmapped if they are distinct from the known phenotypes, facilitating potential novel cell type detection. In a comparison of our tool using scRNA-seq data sets from human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), we show that scCompare outperforms single-cell variational inference (scVI) in higher precision and sensitivity for most of the cell types. scCompare was used on a cardiomyocyte data set where it confirmed the discovery of a distinct cluster of cells that differed between the 2 protocols for differentiation. Further use of scCompare on cell atlas data sets revealed insights into the cellular heterogeneity underpinning biological diversity between samples. In addition, we used a cell atlas to better understand the effect of key parameters used in the scCompare pipeline. We envision that scCompare will be of value to the research community when comparing large scRNA-seq data sets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.